Showing posts with label Erotic Romance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Erotic Romance. Show all posts

December 18, 2014

Reloading The Canon: A Look At Erotic Romance

The idea of a romance genre "canon" has been discussed and debated before, even by yours truly (now the most popular post ever to exist on this blog).  Canon is not always a word I'm entirely comfortable with, mostly because all genres ebb and flow over time.  For me, genre fiction (all genres, not just romance) are a reflection of their times.  Therefore, when looking back on important books in genre history, it often requires readers to put on those rose-colored glasses.  To view the work through the lens of history.  Not all books "stand the test of time" - nor should they be required to.

I got the idea for this post from Victoria Dahl and some kerfuffles that have erupted over the past few days.  Victoria pointed out an influential erotic romance book, now ten years old on Twitter.  I agreed with her, and stated that it's a book I point anyone to who is interested in erotic romance "history."

Which leads us to this post.  Wendy's Top 10 "Canonical" Works In Erotic Romance.  First, the caveats:
1) I'm going to be focusing heavily on the past 20 years or so.  There are countless works (from the bodice ripper era specifically) that I'll leave off.  Mostly because I'm not an expert in this era of romance and don't want to talk out of my backside.

2) I'm going to focus heavily on the "romance" word.  There are countless authors who will not make the cut because their work is more "erotica" than "romance" (Zane would be a prime example.  She's hugely important when we're talking erotica written for a female readership, but I have a hard time classifying her as romance.  Feel free to disagree with me in the comments).

3) I'll name specific titles when I can, but that's really hard for some authors.  In which case, I'll just be naming names.
In no particular order....

1) Skye O'Malley by Bertrice Small (1980). You can make a serious case for Small's The Kadin, but I'm going with that erstwhile Skye O'Malley, the heroine who launched six books and a thousand erotic ships.  Literally.  O'Malley is captain of her own ship, caught in the intrigue of Queen Elizabeth I's court.  Bodices rip, the language is lush and purple.  Love her, hate her, it doesn't really matter.  Small is one of the grand dames of not only erotic romance, but the romance genre as a whole.  If erotic romance were an envelope, Small would be the stamp.

2) Thea Devine.  I can't pick one book by Devine, it's just not possible.  Her writing style is....different.  Her plots are pure Soap Opera Bodice Rippin' WTFBBQ Sauce.  And gods help me, I love her for it.  I love her for it because Devine allowed her heroines to be just as morally ambiguous, just as duplicitous, as her Alphahole heroes in an era when we were overrun with Sweet As Pie, Butter Doesn't Melt In Her Mouth Virgins.  OK, I'll pick a book by Devine.  Desired.  Because it's trashy and southern and gleefully over the top.

3) Susan Johnson.  Again, nearly impossible to pick one title.  Most fans point to her Braddock series (book one is Blaze) and that seems a solid place to start as any.  Queen of the Footnote, Johnson was known for (especially in her earlier works) to really delve into her research.  Then she tossed in plenty of Old School Shenanigans and naughty Sexy Times.  She also published with Playboy Press early in her career, meaning that Johnson found a way to get her work out there, even before the "erotic romance" label was a "thing."

4) The Lady's Tutor by Robin Schone (1999). Or How A Married Victorian Mother Of Two Finds Her Groove Thang.  We see a lot of virginal ingenues in the genre, but Schone delivered a heroine who was older, married, with two kids, who goes looking for something more outside of her passionless marriage to a cold and indifferent husband.  To this day, we still don't see a ton of that in the genre.  Schone really kicked open the door for older heroines.

5) Menage by Emma Holly.  I'm going with Menage because, well, it's about a menage.  It's also the book most readers point to when discussing Holly's work as a whole.  Menage romances are a dime a dozen these days, but Holly did it 1998 and addressed how such relationships can get very complicated, very quickly.

6) Portia Da Costa.  It's just too hard to pick one book by Da Costa, but I'm including her on this list for one very important reason.  She writes "fun."  She's one of the few erotic romance writers out there who hasn't forgotten that sex is supposed to be fun.  There is a playfulness to her work that can sometimes get overlooked in a sub genre that can wallow a bit too much in angst.  In Too Deep is a good illustration of Da Costa's brand of playfulness.

7) Natural Law by Joey W. Hill.  A Domme heroine and a submissive hero.  An author who takes the time to really explore what a BDSM relationship means (trust baby, it's all about trust).  Published in 2004I had issues with this story when I read it not too long ago, but seriously?  Shockingly, breathtakingly ahead of it's time, published ten years ago.  Mores the pity that we continue to see tired retreads in BDSM storylines (clueless heroine = sub ; Alphahole hero = thinks he's Dom but he's really just an Alphahole).  Hill showed us another way 10 years ago - why didn't we listen?

8) Passion by Lisa Valdez (2005).  I'm probably going to get flack for this one, and Lord knows I wasn't personally wild about this book, but I'm including it because everyone lost their damn minds over it.  Why?  To this day I think it's because it looked and was packaged (mass market as opposed to trade paperback or digital) as a "historical romance."  But once you got inside those pages?  Good Lord above!  Turns out a lot of readers didn't like that surprise.  Others were all on board, and blessedly overjoyed they weren't paying trade paperback prices for a change to get their naughty fix.  Turns out, yes - marketing is important.

9)  The Breed series by Lora Leigh.  Go ahead, argue with me that it should be the Men of August series.  I'm not going to tell you you're wrong.  However I'm going with the Breeds for sheer volume and crossover appeal.  Certainly there were other Ellora's Cave writers who parlayed their success into contracts with "traditional" NY publishers (Jaid Black, Angela Knight to name two off the top of my head), but Leigh took her Breeds and turned them into a NYTimes Bestselling, 30-volume juggernaut (includes short stories and March 2015 release).  She also played a hand in the popularity of shifters in paranormal romance.  Hence, she's on the list.

10)  Fifty Shades trilogy by EL James.  I'm including it for two reasons and two reasons only - the first being that it captured word of mouth frenzy outside the confines of the genre.  The second being that it revived the idea that you could follow the same characters over the course of several books and still call it a romance.  Others had done it before (Bertrice Small, Rosemary Rogers), but it had been out of vogue for a number of years.  For good or ill, James helped bring that back.  But really, what I really want to say is Yada yada yada, Fifty Shades, yada yada yada

Erotic romance existed prior to us knowing what to call it, but the first big wave really launched in the late 1990s with Kensington Brava and the birth of Ellora's Cave in 2000.  Readers have always had a desire (ha!) for erotic work, but those two events really galvanized with strategic marketing.  Prior to that readers floundered around and magically found erotic content through trial, error, dumb-luck and that ever elusive word of mouth.  Once the marketing was in place?  It got easier to identify "those books" - then it was just on the reader to flounder around some more and discover the writers who struck a chord with them.

So, what books and authors did I miss?  Make your case in the comments section!

October 2, 2014

The Quick and Dirty History of Erotic Romance

In the wake of the Ellora's Cave vs. Dear Author lawsuit, some discussion has cropped up in various online venues (most recently Twitter, which is where I first saw it) about the birth of the erotic romance sub genre.  Did, in fact, Ellora's Cave "invent" erotic romance?  My name was subsequently dropped as someone who could possibly detail some history and viola!  The idea started to burrow into my brain like a tick on a hound dog's behind.

First, a disclaimer: I've only been reading romance since 1999, and my "history" with the genre is completely tied up with the Internet.  There are countless erotic works pre-Internet that have, over the years, inspired a slew of writers.  For the sake of this post I'm mostly going to focus on the 1990s to present day.

The rise of erotic romance within the romance sub genre is a fairly complex one, and not something that can easily be condensed down into a magic bullet by saying, "So-And-So is responsible for it!"  So as much as Ellora's Cave has, over the years, marketed themselves as the pioneer of the sub genre, they didn't really "invent" it.  So who did?  Well, a bunch of people.

The first faint rumblings of steam launched with a quartet of writers, some of them working as far back as the 1970s and 1980s.  That would be Bertrice Small, Thea Devine, Susan Johnson and Robin Schone.  These ladies were not strictly marketed as erotic romance - they were all, simply, historical romance writers.  However it didn't take long for romance readers to notice and these authors eventually created a brand around themselves.  Authors, what is first and foremost your "brand?"  Yeah, your name.  You read one book by Small, Devine, Johnson or Schone and you knew the next book you pick up by them is more than likely going to singe your eyebrows off.

In 1999, it came to pass that legendary editor Kate Duffy had an idea and that idea eventually launched Kensington Brava.  Duffy wanted to head up an imprint with a strong sensual element, and since Devine and Schone were already writing for Kensington Zebra, she didn't have far too look.  She corralled all four of these pioneers under the new Brava banner and in 1999 the first Brava release, an anthology titled Captivated, hit the shelves.  Those early Brava covers were understated and simple but inside readers found the sensuality and erotic tones they had come to expect from these four writers.  And now they were all in one place, publishing under a new imprint.

What Brava did was begin to mainstream erotic content.  Yes, Ellora's Cave launched in 2000 - but to say they mainstreamed it is fairly misleading.  For one thing, they were a digital-only publisher for a long while and the first generation Kindle didn't launch until 2007.  Yes, people were reading digitally prior to Amazon, but I think we can all agree that Amazon is largely responsible for the sonic boom.  Even among romance readers who were very early adopters.  Ask some of those very early EC readers and you'll find more than a few who downloaded the PDF files and then printed them out (!!) to read.  Whereas imprints like Brava (and a few others I'll mention in a bit) could be found to varying degrees in a bookstore.  Remember those?  Bookstores?

As much as we like to think that every romance reader is online, they aren't.  And that was doubly true 15 years ago.  Countless readers "read in a vacuum."  So stumbling across a digital-only publisher like EC back in the very early days of digital reading?  Not an easy thing unless word of mouth hit their ears.  But walk into any bookstore and chances were pretty good that you'd find a Brava title, or for that matter - a Harlequin Blaze.

People like to think of Harlequin as a "old gray lady," but when they get their branding and marketing right they really get it a right.  Blaze originally launched as a promotional series within Harlequin Temptation.  Near as I can tell the first one was Outrageous by Lori Foster in 1997.  The books had the familiar Temptation branding on them, with a little Blaze logo slapped on the cover.  This was the signal to readers that the stories were going to be "hotter" than a normal Temptation (and that line was no slouch).  Temptation released one Blaze title a month, a promotion that got so popular that in 2001 Blaze became it's own line launching with Notorious by Vicki Lewis Thompson.  Eventually Blaze eroded away Temptation's readership and after 20 years that line folded.  I know romance readers who still light candles in church over the demise of Temptation.

Things were picking up by the late 1990s and readers were getting some more options if they wanted steam.  But what about those readers who predated this era?  In many cases they had to look outside the genre.  Case in point, in 1993 Virgin Publishing (as in Richard Branson) launched Black Lace Books and their mission was to publish "erotic fiction written by women, for women."  Fiction is the key word here.  Black Lace did not promise a traditional happy ending like romance, but savvy readers soon glommed on to key authors within the Black Lace universe who delivered happy endings, albeit nontraditional ones for what the romance genre was offering at that time.  Emma Holly is probably the biggest name here, having published Menage and Cooking Up a Storm in 1998Portia Da Costa was another known quantity at Black Lace who delivered happy endings and her book, The Tutor (a librarian heroine!) was published in 1995.

The issue with Black Lace however was always distribution.  Being based out of the UK, getting your hands on Black Lace titles in the United States was not easy.  If a bookstore carried them they were typically in the "Sexuality" section interfiled with the I Can't Find My G-Spot self-help titles.  I'm telling you, Amazon was the best thing that ever happened for Black Lace fans.  Seriously.

Also around this time Red Sage Publishing launched their Secrets anthology series.  Volume 1 appeared in 1995 and the latest, Volume 31, was published this past JulyAlice Gaines, Angela Knight, Saskia Walker, Charlotte Featherstone, and Jennifer Probst are just a few of the names that have been featured in Secrets anthologies over the years.

So if EC didn't "invent" erotic romance, what did they do exactly?  Well they really helped ramp it all up.  Blaze and Brava were heavily focused on "sensuality" in those days.  As much as naysayers like to claim that the romance genre never changes, that's a bunch of hooey.  If you pick up, say, an early Brava title and read it today it's going to seem really tame.  Hard to believe that when the line launched there were corners of the online community that were signalling it as the beginning of the end for the genre.  I remember reading light bondage and spanking (for example) in early Brava titles - but hardcore BDSM?  Yeah, not so much.  Also EC was one (if not the only) publisher at that time publishing erotic romance content in science fiction and paranormal worlds.  Red Sage did some of that as well, but in those early days they were doing anthologies only.  EC was offering stand-alone novels.

EC also played a healthy hand in marketing.  As I've already detailed, erotic romance did exist before EC we just.....didn't know what to call it.  I was reviewing for The Romance Reader at this time and while I cannot recall for certain now, I was either the only or one of the very few reviewers who welcomed reviewing this "new" type of romance.  I slogged through a lot of "I'm a good girl virgin who wants to be baaaaaad" stories.  Seriously, you all owe me.  Big time.  Anyway, looking at my early reviews I called this "new" type of romance everything from romantica to romance-erotica to erotic romance.  Finally, we all settled on erotic romance, although where that term actually came from is anybody's guess.  I think I first heard it via Kate Duffy - but cannot definitively say "She's the one!!"

So all this begs the question - if erotic romance has been around so long why did everyone lose their minds over Fifty Shades of Grey?  I get this question a lot from work colleagues.  My answer is that for many non-romance readers, the idea of erotic romance was a completely foreign concept to them.  Remember that first Black Lace novel you read?  Remember how it blew your mind?  Yeah, that's what Fifty Shades did a bunch of readers.  Fifty Shades also brought back the tamer covers a la those early Brava titles, so the packaging was eye-catching while not being salacious (well, except for the handcuffs cover!) and word of mouth took off among non-romance readers.  Once that happens, all bets are off.  What most of us found increasingly frustrating was the idea that somehow EL James had "invented" erotic romance and putting BDSM into a romance novel.  Which, hello?  Go back to the top and reread this post.

What also tends to get lost in all of this history is how ground-breaking the first wave of erotic-romance was.  I honestly remember a ton of hand-wringing on listservs and the All About Romance message boards.  To be fair to those readers who thought "erotica" was the beginning of the end, they had been dealing with a-holes for years who were calling romance "porn for women" (not much has changed).  Now, hello erotica!  Sexing up the Sexy Times isn't going to do anything to dissuade that "opinion."  But soon enough most of us were having too much fun reading it to really give a flying hoot what non-romance readers thought anyway.  Bugger off and all that.  And if you think that was brain-bleed inducing?  I remember plenty of early "discussion" that if you were an author who published with a digital-only publisher you weren't a "real author" and was erotic romance even really romance?

Seriously.  It really was this incredible.  I spent a lot of time biting my tongue and saying "Seriously?!?!  Seriously, now?!?!?!?"

That's my quick and condensed dirty version of erotic romance history in the past 15 years.  I could go into quite a bit of depth on how I, personally, came to discover the genre - but I've rambled on long enough.  I'll just wrap it up by saying Thea Devine, Emma Holly and Portia Da Costa - y'all changed my life.  Bless you from the bottom of my dirty, dirty heart.

Note: Thanks to Ridley and Lynn from AAR over on Twitter for inspiring this post.