The Book: Snowdrops and Scandalbroth by Barbara Metzger
The Particulars: Traditional Regency, Fawcett Crest, 1997, Out of print, eBook publication by Belgrave House 2010.
Why Was It In Wendy's TBR?: This one has been in my TBR for literal decades because of two words: Virgin. Hero.
The Review: For this month's optional theme, Previously, In Romance..., I decided to not only go Old School, but to go with a subgenre that no longer exists - Traditional Regency. For you young'uns, Trads were category length, Regency-set historicals often defined by the manners of the era and "just kisses" romances. They had a hearty following back in their day with numerous publishers having their own lines. By the early 2000s however we were in the final death throes and once Signet killed their line in 2006 it was pretty much over. But you can still find many of them floating around in digital reprints, and, of course, in all the places you can find used books.
I picked up Snowdrops and Scandalbroth, quite literally, decades ago because I am nothing if not trash for a virgin hero - and this story has one. What I didn't realize is that this turns out to be one virgin hero who does his damnedest to turn me off his brethren entirely. A more sanctimonious prig you'll never meet - despite the fact he has one really great scene where he talks about the common double standard between men and women being "pure" until the marriage bed. It's not enough to make up for how insufferable I generally found him.
Kathlyn Partland is in a bind. Her mother, gone for many years, was disowned by her blue-blooded family when she married Kathlyn's father, a poor tutor. He, in the fine tradition of Romancelandia Fathers, makes no arrangements for Kathlyn, financially or otherwise, so when he dies she's quite literally on her own. She manages to secure a job as a governess in London but her mail coach is quite delayed through a series of misadventures and when she finally arrives she finds out the family has given up on her, gone to the country and hired someone else.
Riding to her rescue is Courtney Choate, Viscount Chase, who can't just leave the damsel in distress when he spies her lost, carrying her own luggage, down a seedy London street. She's pretty much accosted in no time flat. Courtney is in a bind of his own. He was engaged, but unceremoniously dumped his betrothed after finding out she's had two lovers already. Our Courtney is very principled and having witnessed the pain his father's infidelities caused his mother has vowed to 1) wait until marriage and 2) to never, ever take a mistress. He has vowed to stay true to his future wife, whomever she turns out to be. Of course the broken engagement gets tongues wagging, and soon Courtney's manliness and sexual preference is called into question (the author doesn't come out and say "everybody thinks he's queer" but it's definitely implied between the lines). Anyway, Courtney goes off to war, and despite coming back a hero with a bullet wound and gimpy leg, the rumors persist.
We all can guess what happens next. Kathlyn is flat broke with no options. Courtney needs to convince the gossipmongers and the ton he likes girls. She puts up a token resistance but before you can say bingo-bango, she's going by an assumed name and masquerading as Courtney's mistress - for a new wardrobe and a pile of coins, of course.
This sounds pretty straight-forward but it's actually an Everything and the Kitchen Sink romance. It's a farce y'all. Not only do you have the Fake Mistress thing going on, there's also a jewel heist involved (remember Kathlyn's delayed mail coach?) which brings Bow Street calling, along with the dead thief's compatriots he swindled - and they all think that Kathlyn knows where the missing jewels are. There's also a misunderstanding thrown in - Kathlyn thinks Courtney needs a fake mistress to convince the ton he's "still a man" because she speculates the wartime bullet wound damaged his, uh, "little soldier." Courtney, of course, isn't forthcoming as to the why he needs the fake mistress subterfuge so speculation is all our girl has.
The cast soon bloats like a drunk on a 3-day bender to include future appearances and mentions of Courtney's former fiancée (hello, slut-shaming, followed by fat-shaming - because of course she married a decrepit old man after Courtney dumped her and put on some pounds), Courtney's former nanny, two rascally Lords he pals around with (well, sort of), two Bow Street Runners, three members of the jewel thief gang, the nannie's grandchildren, Kathlyn's loathsome aunt, Courtney's mother, and a partridge in a pear tree.
For the record, Trad Regencies are category length, and this one clocks in at a little over 200 pages. The author takes many writing short-cuts to trim down word count (a lot is mentioned but takes place off page), coupled with the farce and the large secondary cast means very little time is given to the actual romance. Which probably isn't a bad thing since what is on page largely didn't work for me. Courtney has one good scene where he talks about "purity" and the double-standard between men and women and why aren't men held to the same standards, yada yada yada - but otherwise he's entirely too smug and self-righteous for my tastes. There's one really good scene where Kathlyn fires both barrels at him - but otherwise there's just not enough here to make be buy into these two falling in love. A lot of what I would consider "courtship moments" take place off page. The whole thing is entirely too overcrowded by the farcical comedy (Kathlyn gets kidnapped TWICE!) and the wide cast of secondary characters. Basically folks what we have here is a screwball comedy set in Regency England and it just didn't work for me.
That said, I know there's a readership out there for farce and certainly it can work very well in a Trad Regency setting. However, Courtney nearly putting me off virgin heroes entirely (which I thought was basically impossible - who knew?) coupled with the strong Not Like Other Girls vibe to Kathlyn and the general overall writing of Courtney's former fiancée (deplorable) means that this is a Old School romance that just hasn't aged all that well.
Final Grade = D+
Note: It's not lost on me that I have referred to a book published in 1997 as "old school." Excuse me while I go crawl into my coffin...
5 comments:
Yup, I haven't read this Barbara Metzger regency but I've read some of hers and they do tend to be on farcical "wacky" side. I don't mind wacky but it's not to everyone's taste. And I definitely do without the drowning in secondary characters problem.
Nothing that was a real throwback in my TBR called out to me, so I went with THE EARL WHO ISN'T by Courtney Milan b/c I decided to interpret the theme of "previously"as a historical romance *and* series I had set down and wandered away from. Courtney Milan tends to be an author where I either love the book or it's a DNF, which is why I tend to snap up her books and then drag my feet about actually reading them. This was in her Wedgeford Trials series (the last one!) which is set in a cozy town in England that has a thriving Asian population. Yes, I think there is some historical license taken to set this up in 1800s (?) England but not much. Considering the amount of dukes in romancelandia, I don't mind it. The author gives a lot of background on the actual Asian community in English history in her author's notes.
This book wasn't a DNF, but sadly it didn't fly to the heights of some earlier books in the series and in her canon. It repeated a lot of elements I've seen in her other books. Hero is of the nobility, but doesn't want to be and is keeping it a secret. Heroine is very blunt and pragmatic and worried about turning people off. It was nice and readable and I'll always love visiting Wedgeford, but it was just middling compared to the first two charming books.
Alas, onward!
damaged his, uh, "little soldier."
😂
I loved the title of this but screwball comedy on a good day is hard for me, add in a sanctimonious MMC, going pass.
Old School for 1997 😭 but not sure we could call Metzger anything else
Yuck! This book sounds terrible. I have some Metzgers in my collection, and the one I read/reviewed previously was not to my taste, so I'm a little nervous now. Obviously I need to move what I have up Mount TBR so I can decide if they are worth hanging on to!
I chose "Dream of Me" by Lisa Cach this month (sequel to last month's "Come with Me") and it was...not great. Very rapey/sex-shaming/cringey, broke the worldbuilding rules, and with leads that just didn't inspire much empathy in me. What a letdown after the first book! But it's not enough to put me off entirely, because I knew this was going to be an uphill battle to rehabilitate this "hero" considering what an asshole he was in the first book.
Hi Wendy!
Comedy/fun vibes or atmosphere in books can be rather annoying. I prefer a little bit of angst in my stories or, at least, some seriousness in how issues are discussed, so fun scenes can bit a hit or miss. From what you describe, this one doesn't seem to be a balanced story.
Good luck for March! ;)
I went from loving Milan to have quite an allergy to her work. :-(
As for this book... good grief!
Post a Comment