I've gotta be honest - the beefcake covers don't do a whole lot for me. Yes, I like men. In fact, I
adore men. But I don't need to see a bare-arsed chest on
every single one of my romance books. Just don't. That being said, I recently got some promotional bookmarks and among the batch was this eye-popping, jaw-dropping, stud muffin on the cover of
Christina Skye's September release,
To Catch A Thief. I hate to morph to one of those giggly romance fangirls who gets steamy over some hunky cover model - but
dayum!
10 comments:
Yeah, as a rule I don't care for acres of rampant pecs and abs on the cover of a book... I think clothes are as sexy as flesh.
But this particular interpretation is rather tasty. :)
See you soon in SF!
you wanna review it ;)
This is actually semi-believable mantitty. And he doesn't look too dumb. Plus he's not looking at me--biggest cover peeve.
So he'll do.
ummm yeah, I want one of those bookmarks. LOL
He's not "overdone" and like Sherry Thomas said, he's not looking at me.
hmmmmmm
when I say not "overdone" I mean his boobs are not bigger than mine! LOLOLOL
I'm a D cup and nothing is more squicky than looking at a mantitty cover with a model whose boobs are bigger than mine! ;o)
I'd do him.
Yup I agree. :-D
And Sherry - I have that same pet peeve! LOL
Um, no offense, but YUCK! I've never been big on guys built like that. I prefer them slender. Like young Mr. Spock or Barry Manilow. Now THAT'S my idea of sexy!
I like it a lot better than her latest Code Name: books. I haven't read any of them just because of the silly titles. This one I would try *g*
What is with the lack of chest hair on cover studs? I'm not saying I like to embrace or even drool over a bear but really, some of the covers look like they used plastic Ken dolls instead of real men!
I do like this pose better than a lot of them.
Post a Comment