Thursday, October 8, 2009

Obligatory Disclosure Post

Since the FTC has now revised their guide on endorsements (and if you don't know what I'm talking about, check out Dear Author's posts on the topic), I figured what the hell? Everybody else is doing one, so why not do my very own disclaimer post! I suspect 99.99% of you could give a rat's ass, but if I do this post, I can then bury the link on my sidebar and never have to deal with this boring crap ever again. See, it's win-win! Plus, I don't think I've ever talked about this stuff before, so it's probably good for me to let it all hang out (as it were).

1) I am a member of Amazon Associates. This means when I link to Amazon, and you click on that link, and you then purchase the product, I get a small "fee" for referring you. I mostly did this on a lark, since I use Blogger, which is a free service, and unlike the bigger blogs out there, I don't have any web hosting costs and am not too concerned with postage costs for contests (since I rarely run contests). So far, since signing up for the program in the spring of 2007, I've made less than $90. Yeah. Small potatoes thy name is Wendy.

Guess it's a good thing I didn't impulsively quit my day job. Ha!

I also use my Amazon Associates ID when linking over at my Upcoming Historical Romances wiki. I justify doing this because - hot damn! Do you know how much time I spend working on that thing? I know it doesn't look like much; basically it's just a list with some pretty cover art. But chasing down that information and getting it posted does take some effort on my part. If I can earn a few pennies for the time I spend on it, I'm going to take them.

Linking to Amazon does in no way constitute an endorsement of any kind on my part. I link just as readily to books that made my eyes bleed as I do to books I want to have babies with. If you don't want to put any money in my pocket? That's cool. No skin off my nose. Don't click on any of my Amazon links and then don't put the book(s) in question in your shopping cart. Easy peasy. And we can even still be friends.

2) I do, on occasion, accept advanced copies of books from authors and publishers. In no way does receiving these ARCs "earn" an author or publisher higher marks when it comes to my reviewing. If I hate the book, I'm going to say I hated it. Regardless of whether or not I got it for free. If I loved it, I'm going to tell readers of this blog why I loved it. Simple as that.

I've been reviewing online since 1999, and in that time never once has my objectivity been called into question (well, at least to my face). I sort of resent that it is now - even though I've hardly been singled out. But whatever....

To make it easy, when I'm reviewing an ARC on this blog, I will now add "ARC Review" in the tag field at the bottom of the post. I will start doing this as of today, October 8, 2009. Since I have yet to go back and do general tagging on the bulk of my archives? Yeah, don't expect me to retroactively tag my older ARC review posts. Even if I could remember what reviews were for ARCs, frankly? I don't wanna.

And so ends this disclaimer. Yada, yada, yada.

12 comments:

BookObsessed said...

Excellent disclaimer! I especially love the 'books that make my eyes bleed' comment. :o)

Amy said...

Ditto! I'm trying to figure out if I'll even post a disclaimer of some sort on my blog since there I only post the occassional review of books I've read from my own TBR (which I've spent a butt-ton of money on over several years).

I need to bring this all to Terrie's attention over at RRT since we do review ARCs sent to us by publishers and authors. She's probably heard, however.

azteclady said...

What a cool disclaimer!

I need to check with Karen, but I'd like to do something like this for my reviews on her blog.

Jill D. said...

God, you crack me up!

Um, I have made a total of $1.40 through Amazon Associates. LOL, don't spend it all in one place. To be honest I was so shocked to see that someone actually bought something!

I like that you dated your post and that you will be disclosing from this day forward. Good idea.

Lynn Spencer said...

Your disclosure cracks me up and I love the picture! The more I research the issue, the more incredulous I become. I just wish the FTC had tailored things a little more narrowly.

JamiSings said...

Heh. I think I've made exactly zlitch with my AA links, but in my case I link to stuff I actually do like.

Sad you have to post a disclaimer though. Some people need to get a life.

Katiebabs a.k.a KB said...

I can so see this being an episode on Law & Order. Someone at the FTC takes down a blogger because they didn't put a disclaimer in their review.

Karenmc said...

I understand the need to keep people honest, but jeez louise, I hope the FTC throws out their broad brush and replaces it with something more nuanced.

I REALLY appreciate your Upcoming Historicals. Thanks for taking the time to get all those books listed.

sybil said...

that seems simple enough

The whole thing seems a bit blown up and I feel like I am missing something. But I am thinking it is because I haven't been around.

Tara Marie said...

Nicely done and no drama :)

Rosie said...

*Disclaimer* This comment contains language that may be objectionable. It's rated R for "R u kidding me with this stuff?"

Holy crap! I think I'll just cut and paste your disclaimer. Not that I'm an Amazon Associate or anything, but WTH, it can't hurt.

Tracy said...

Great disclaimer...now bury it. (I love that!)